|
|
|
|
|
|
9/11
Truth: History, Online
Monday
28th June 2004 "Today,
history was made online. LetsRoll911.org
have revealed the identity of the pilot who shot down Flight 93 on
11th September 2001. This information has been confirmed as accurate
by Alex
Jones. For
many, it was obvious that the Boeing could never have crashed in that
manner without having been shot out of the sky with air-to-air
missiles. How else could anyone explain how one of the engines landed
more than 5 miles from the fuselage? Yet the US Government maintains
that the passengers themselves crashed the aeroplane. This
is a unique event, certainly for me. In the history of intrigue and
cover-up, 9/11 is the first event which I have investigated myself and
have therefore followed its twists and turns with interest from early
on. In
a way, the identification of Major Rick Gibney's identity as the pilot
who fired the two Sidewinder missiles at Flight 93, is the first piece
of information that you can reach out and touch about the 9/11
cover-up. For
all the discussion and speculation over operational details of the
hijackings, the real identity of the hijackers, the financial and
intellectual force behind the attacks, and even the motive, Gibney is
the first person who truly embodies the truth that flies in the
face of government lies. Much
of what actually took place on the day of September 11th is not known.
A handful of government commissions and reports have only highlighted
the inconsistency in the official version of events, yet to ask
awkward questions in light of the inconsistency is akin to suffering
from leprosy - it takes the right sort of person to want to get close
to you. Today
changed things. No longer will we be deceived. It is one thing to
understand that Flight 93 could not have been crashed by its
passengers. It is something else entirely when a pilot whose actions
directly contradict the official story and all who recited it, can
actually be identified. Bear
this in mind the next time you hear the words `conspiracy theories.'
" -
Editor
|
|
|
|
The
New Pearl Harbor
|
|
Friday 25th
June 2004 13:30
|
|
"David Ray
Griffin, the author of `The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions
About the Bush Administration and 9/11' was in the UK for a few days.
Unfortunately, it
was a quick visit and I therefore didn't have an opportunity to
interview him while he was here.
However, he did
appear on Channel 4's `Richard and Judy' show. I only learned about
this afterwards, so if anyone has a copy of his appearance on video,
I'll help get the footage out there if anyone wants to send it to me.
I'll have an
audio interview with David Ray Griffin posted here within the next
week, and possibly with Michael Meacher, MP, who wrote the foreword to
the book.
Additionally,
I'm expecting a delivery of copies of `The New Pearl Harbor', which
will be available to UK residents to purchase from this site, priced
approx. £11 including delivery. This may not be the lowest price in
comparison with sites like Amazon, but buying from ThoughtCrimeNews
will help support my work and my bandwidth bill. It will also give me
some indication of whether there is any incentive for me to stock
other videos and books.
Finally,
the text of the Daily Mail's article has been posted online for easier
reading. You can find it at either Global
Free Press, courtesy of Nico Haupt, or at SeptemberEleventh.org.
Kim
Sun-Il
Another beheading
in Iraq, this time of South Korean Kim Sun-Il. I don't know what to
make of it all, I haven't studied it closely enough,
Captain Wardrobe
has some info about this episode and others, on his `Down
With Murder Inc.' page. Scroll to the bottom for info on Kim
Sun-Il.
What I can say
about Kim's beheading is that the video is peculiar. The time in the
corner keeps jumping back and forth during the beheading and
subsequent display of the head. This doesn't seem right to me.
Additionally, I don't recall ever seeing a time displayed in the
corner of a video like that, having been generated by the camera at
least. Maybe I'm wrong on this particular point.
If anyone has
ideas on what's really going on here, please drop me a line.
Has anyone
noticed that all these videos are mainstreaming the acceptance of
snuff-movies. A Scandinavian website apparently reports that Muslim
kids are now playing re-enactments of the beheading of Nick Berg. This
sort of thing is not good for the signals sent out to the rest of
society.
How long before
they try to make an episode of `Queer Eye For The Straight Guy' in
Baghdad with Muqtada El-Sadr? That's how bad things are getting."
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
Mainstream
Coverage of 9/11 Inconsistencies
|
|
Posted
Tuesday 15th June 2004
|
|
"The
Daily Mail on Saturday 5th June ran a story across the centre pages
based on David Ray Griffin's new book `The New Pearl Harbor'.
Click on
the scans below to enlarge."
-
Editor


|
|
|
|
More
exclusive video content coming very soon
|
|
|
|
London
Mayoral Elections Today
|
|
Thursday
June 10th 2004
|
|
"Two
more videos are available of interviews about the election for London
Mayor.
I
interviewed Darren Johnson, the Green Party Candidate, about his views
of what London needs.
Click
here to watch the video
I also
interviewed Lee Jasper, the
Chair of `Operation Black Vote',
the group which organised Tuesday's debate.
Click
here to watch the video
Finally,
there is yesterday's video available, where Simon caught up with
London Mayor, Ken Livingstone, after the debate. The video is called
"They don't call him `Red Ken' for nothing", because
if you watch the video, you'll hear Ken say that he'd like the powers
of the Mayor of Moscow.
Click
here to watch the video
Don't
forget to vote."
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
London
Mayoral Elections
|
|
Wednesday
9th June
|
|
"I
attended the London Mayoral hustings last night, which were in
that case targeted at London's black community. Plenty of footage from
last night, but not really enough time to post it before the elections
on Thursday.
My
interview with Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London, is available online.
They don't call him Red Ken for nothing.
Click
here to watch the video.
Further
videos will available in the coming days. If you appreciate the work
done by ThoughtCrimeNews, please support our
work. "
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
Tenet's
Resignation Substantiates
Allegations Of Assassination Plot
|
|
4th June
2004
by Simon
Aronowitz
|
|
George Tenet's
resignation surprised many in the USA yesterday. According to the Guardian
newspaper, even Dick Cheney, Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice were
only informed yesterday morning in a meeting with President Bush.
Readers of a little known website, however, knew last Tuesday 25th May
that George Tenet's resignation was imminent.
The story
publicly available at ThoughtCrimeNews.com
advised readers that the resignation of Tenet, as well as those of
Colin Powell and Richard Armitage, were inevitable. It further
alleged, according to information provided, that the Bush
Administration trio were to resign because their involvement in a plot
to assassinate President Bush, and perhaps others, had been uncovered.
ThoughtCrimeNews
understandably hedged somewhat with the story, leaving events to
confirm the veracity of its sources' claims, not all of which have
been published. Readers of the story from Tuesday will, however, have
more of an idea of the true reasons for George Tenet's departure than
the White House press corps.
Some observers
are now privately predicting that Powell and Armitage will resign
together next week. Should they both resign as predicted, many
internet news-hounds will see the Bush administration shake-up very
differently from the view taken by the mainstream media. Despite
numerous allegations against Tenet regarding possible involvement in
the 9/11 attacks, of covering up the real extent of Iraqi WMD and of
having involvement in the `Abu Ghraib photographs', his explanation
that he was going for personal reasons seems to be accepted at face
value by the unquestioning mainstream media.
Tenet is quoted
as saying ``It was a personal decision, and had only one basis in
fact: the well being of my wonderful family, nothing more and nothing
less.'' He did not resign over any of the failures or other black-ops
over which he presided. No director of the CIA is an angel but Tenet
in particular was at the helm whilst some of the America's darkest
days have become chapters in its history books. Despite all of this,
he plainly felt it unnecessary to answer for anything that happened on
his watch.
Tenet's sudden
desire to attend to the well being of his family may give rise to
speculation that he was advised of the merits of resigning quietly,
rather than fight a rear-guard action. Whilst the version of events
presented here may seem preposterous to some, it should be noted that
only 10 days ago it would have seemed far-fetched to many observers
the suggestion that George Tenet would resign before the 2004
Presidential election at all. Yet yesterday he resigned earlier than
anyone expected, citing his personal reasons.
Speculation has
now shifted to who the replacements may be. James Woolsey is tipped to
replace George Tenet at the CIA. One source told us "The smart
money's on him. Woolsey would be a bi-partisan favourite, having first
served as Director of the CIA under Bill Clinton." Other
suggestions include John Bolton replacing Powell at the State
Department.
The inevitable
cycle and agenda of the news organisations will ensure that neither
Tenet's activities at Langley nor his reason for leaving will be
scrutinised. Once again, it would seem that the internet has managed
to scoop the mainstream media. Unfortunately, those who only read the
papers will never know.
|
|
|
|
Tenet,
Powell and Armitage to go - EXCLUSIVE
25th May
2004 - Update
by Simon
Aronowitz
|
|
Sources
close to the Bush administration have informed ThoughtCrimeNews that
CIA Director, George Tenet, Secretary of State, Colin Powell and
Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, will be forced to resign
their positions, possibly before the end of this week.
Whilst
some would consider Tenet, Powell and Armitage to be team players in
George W Bush's administration, our sources advise us that in fact
these three have been caught out on something for which there can be
no reconciliation.
As yet,
the media are largely unaware of the recent events involving these
three characters, namely a plot to assassinate President Bush and
Vice-President Cheney as well as Speaker of the House, J Dennis
Hastert and Senate President Pro Tempore, Ted Stevens. In the event
that these four individuals were to be killed, the next in line to the
US Presidency would be none other than the Secretary of State,
currently Colin Powell.
Should
these resignations take place, as we expect, in the coming days,
the pre-emptive publication of this story will serve to illustrate
that our sources have provided us with sound information, not only of
the impending departures but also the reason for them.
Story
developing...
|
|
|
|
BREAKING
NEWS
25th May
2004 12:30
|
|
"ThoughtCrimeNews
has learned that we may soon see the departure of the following people
from office:
George
Tenet
Colin Powell
Richard Armitage
Story
developing......."
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
New
video online
Sunday
23rd May 2004
|
|
"Today's
addition features Phil Berg,
lawyer for Ellen Mariani, discussing why he had doubts about the
official 9/11 story from the outset.
Click
here to watch the video"
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
New
video online
Friday
21st May 2004
|
|
"Another
video has today been added. This one has myself and Barbara
Honegger at the 9/11 Inquiry discussing the pilot episode of The
Lone Gunmen, Seven Days in May, what might really have hit the
Pentagon on 11th September and at what time?
Click
here to watch the video"
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
Videos
online
Wednesday
19th May 2004
|
|
"Two
videos are now available online to watch:
Today's
addition is a clip discussing the newspaper coverage given to the 9/11
Inquiry in San Francisco.
Click
here to watch it
Monday's
clip featured Jim Marrs, Mike Berger and myself discussing terrorism
in the USA and information warfare.
Click
here to watch it
At the
moment I am working on some more clips and setting up the subscription
area and service, where more clips of a longer length and of a higher
bandwidth quality will be available."
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
New
video available to watch
|
|
Monday 17th
May 2004
|
|
"As
promised, I have posted a video for your enjoyment.
The
roughly 9 minute segment features Jim
Marrs, Mike Berger of the St Louis 9-11 Visibility Project, and
me, Simon Aronowitz, Editor and webmaster of this website.
More
clips will be coming, but I've decided that I can't be entirely
generous and altruistic about allowing people to see all the video I
have to offer.
I'd give
it away if I could, but bandwidth costs money, and I'm hoping to be
able to devote more time to video production, perhaps even drawing me
away from my regular 9-5 pay-the-bills type work.
So I've
decided that I will gladly post lower quality clips for free access,
but there will be a wider range of videos, and at a higher quality,
available to subscribers. Yes, subscribers.
Well you
pay for satellite television and newspapers don't you? This site gets
a steady 400 hits a day. Surely there are some out there who are
getting something from this site. If they're not at the moment, many
of you will be able to when there is a wider range of material
available. And I promise you, it IS coming.
Feel
free to email me with your thoughts on this strategy. But I'd prefer
to hear from people who are in favour of this. I won't be charging
much for a subscription, it will be in the region of what Paul Joseph
Watson and Alex Jones are charging at PrisonPlanet.tv.
Not to
mention the fact that the trip to San Francisco cost a LOT of money,
and I was one of only three people there from the UK, including Nafeez
Mosaddeq Ahmed, and he was one of the speakers.
So to
you guys in the UK who are looking to encourage and support a new,
growing alternative medium, well here's your chance.
And now,
the link to the video. Click here
Check
back daily for updates. Subscription section coming soon.
A
further note on filming in London
The
troubles I and my `camera crew' experienced whilst filming in London,
being detained by the police to explain what we were doing, needn't
have happened, according to the police.
Apparently,
if we just tell them in advance of filming who we are, what we're
filming and where we're going to be, then they won't bother us. I
thought this was supposed to be a free country, but how can we be free
if we have to account for out actions, in advance, to the police?
Weren't the Communists like that? How different is the UK from the old
USSR?"
-
Editor
|
|
|
|
No
I Am Not Dead
|
|
Sunday 16th
May 2004
|
|
"After a
long absence, it's definitely time that this website was updated.
Do I
have an excuse for having done nothing to it at all for more than two
months? Probably not, but I've been trying to get my life in order,
though some would argue it's still as dis-ordered as ever.
9/11
Conference in San Francisco
I
attended the 9/11
Inquiry (Phase 1) which was held in San Francisco on 26th -
28th March. I hadn't made mention of my intentions to go on this
website, because I wanted to ensure that I would get into the US. IP
logs for users accessing this website showed that it was being
scrutinised by elements of the US Government and others, so I figured
it wouldn't do to advertise the fact that I was going. I managed to
slip in under the radar, so to speak. The only trouble I had on the
way out at Heathrow was that the microphone for my digital camcorder
looked odd on the X-ray machine, so they wanted to go through my hand
luggage. Of course, the staff were very friendly about it.
Incidentally,
the quality of airline food seems to have slipped further. For those
without specific dietary requirements, the choice of meal was either
beef stew or `bangers and mash', served in the requisite TV-dinner
microwave plastic tub. I'm sure I remember a time when the food looked
like a miniature version of something you might have got in a
restaurant, complete with a proper plate and cutlery. Today we're not
even trusted with a metal fork, in case someone gets the wrong idea
about the pilot's aversion to someone waving cutlery at him.
There is
much to report from the conference in San Francisco, and yet in a way,
most of it is already out there. Some of you reading this website will
be aware of the material which was discussed at the event, even
without knowing who the speakers were.
Whilst
the official hearings for the 9/11
Commission were taking place on the US east coast, discussing the
issue of possible fore-knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, our own
Inquiry on the west coast was discussing evidence which exposed the
lie that is the continuing 9/11 cover-up and official story.
For me,
the conference was primarily a chance to network with others, to make
contacts and get to know some other people involved in what might be
called the `Underground Truth Movement', underground because there
doesn't seem to be much mainstream coverage that would even make us
look silly, never mind give us authority and credibility.
For
example, Ted Gunderson, the
former Senior Special Agent in Charge of the Los Angeles FBI Field
Office attended the event and I was able to spend some time talking to
him. Ted was one of the many individuals who have been trying to
present information to the public about 9/11 and other nefarious
activities, but have been ignored by the big media organisations.
Ellen
Mariani and her lawyer, Phil Berg, also made highly respectable
and moving arguments for a full investigation into 9/11.
Others
who were present included
Daniel
Hopsicker, author of `Barry and the Boys' and `Welcome to
Terrorland: Mohammed Atta And The 9-11 Cover-Up In Florida'
Michael Ruppert
Kris Millegan,
editor of `Fleshing Out Skull And Bones' Webster
Tarpley, co-author of the Unauthorised
Biography of George HW Bush
Eric Hufschmid, author of
`Painful Questions' and producer of the video `Painful Deceptions'
Anthony Hilder
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed,
author of `The
War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked' and `Behind The
War Ib Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq'
Jim Marrs, author of `The War On
Freedom: The 9-11 Conspiracies', `Rule By Secrecy', `Alien Agenda',
and `Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy'
Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone
There
were more people present, but I can't think of them for the moment. As
Bush recently said at one of his press conferences, when asked an
unscripted question, `maybe
something will pop into my head'.
I got a
lot of video footage from San Francisco and I'm trying to decide how
best to use it. I'll post some excerpts on the website, an if I
receive positive feedback from it I'll post some more clips. I have
footage of the majority of the people listed above. If you have a
particular preference, drop me an email.
Phase
II of the Inquiry happens at the end of May in Toronto.
Unfortunately my financial circumstances mean that I can't afford to
go. Not unless some kind and rich benefactor wants to help me out. If
you have a thousand bucks or so spare, and would like to throw it in
my direction, please use the `Support Us' link at the top of the page.
The
Beheading of Nick Berg
This
sickening episode has understandably been setting the news agenda for
the past week. The video clip can be found here.
Be warned that it is extremely graphic. More analysis of the Nick Berg
affair can be found at PrisonPlanet.tv.
Of
course, the news dominating the previous couple of week's headlines
was the torture photos purporting to show American and British troops
abusing and torturing Iraqi prisoners.
The
pressure in the UK on the the Daily Mirror, in the face of growing
accusations that the British photos were fakes, led Friday to the
resignation of the Mirror's editor, Piers Morgan. In the US, however,
it seems to be acknowledged that the `American' photos are genuine,
but the Pentagon is saddling up to pin the whole affair on the CIA.
Both
public news stories and other sources indicate that a show-trial is
being set up in Baghdad for the very public court-martial of Lindy
England and others. There would not be a media circus around the
proceedings unless the Pentagon was sure that it would not have egg on
its face as a result.
Film-making
Over the
last couple of weeks, I've been out and about with a camera-man and
sound man filming in London. We filmed the May Day rally, which was
really nothing more than a Communist Party Rally, including a
contingent from the Iranian Communist Party. Nice to know that the
reds are still up to their old tricks. We also went to see who was
around Grosvenor Square, outside the American Embassy. We weren't
filming there for long when we were stopped and questioned by three
armed police officers.
Last
Saturday we were stopped and searched in Parliament Square, outside
the Houses of Parliament. It seems that a 3-man film crew, who the
police agreed was doing nothing wrong, warranted invasive police
action, whereas 20 rollerbladers and skateboarders, causing an
obstruction and criminal damage, warranted no intervention whatsoever.
On this occasion, there were five members of the Metropolitan Police
present - three proper officers and two Police Community Support
Officers.
However,
on neither occasion could they provide any basis upon which I had to
provide them with my genuine details, and stated that they have the
authority to stop and question us under the Terrorism Act.
We also
discovered that whilst tourists can film with their own camcorders in
Trafalgar Square to their heart's content, a professional crew (or at
least one that looks professional with a full size broadcast quality
camera) must ask for permission from the Mayor's office because it has
now been designated a `Heritage Site'.
Some of the
footage from this activity will also be posted on this site in the
coming days. Expect some regular updates as I try to bring the site
back up to date. So much has happened over the last couple of months
whilst this site has been neglected." -
Editor
|
|
|
|
|
|